| To Part 1: Sometimes
Crying “Wolf!” is a Good Thing,
“Truth is violated by falsehood, but it is outraged by silence” (Henri
Frederic Amiel)
Federal
wildlife biologists have taken much criticism lately for their sins of
commission—falsifying lynx evidence where there were no lynx. But even
more disastrous than their sins of commission, are their sins of omission.
Former MT House FWP Chairman Dan Fuchs has obtained hard evidence of the
following:
-
The Feds have known since 1997 that elk calf ratios were being totally
decimated in areas of high wolf concentration.
-
When MT FWP personnel attempted to release this evidence to the public,
the Feds aggressively barred MT FWP from doing so.
Beginning in 1997, Carrie Schaefer did a study of Yellowstone wolf/elk
interaction entitled “Spatial and Temporal Variation in Wintering Elk Abundance
and Composition, and Wolf Response…” Amongst other things, her study
revealed that areas of high wolf concentration inside Yellowstone had Elk
calf ratios dropping precipitously - 0 to 10 calves per 100, even while
the ratio outside high wolf concentration areas remained at 46 calves per
100!
When MT FWP biologist Tom Lemke and others made written request for
permission to release this data to the public; the Fed response to suppress
it was swift, aggressive, and sustained. On 2/18/99, Yellowstone Supervisory
Biologist Glenn Plumb wrote: “It is my position, after reviewing Ms. Schaefer’s
investigation, that her raw data do not warrant full distribution to the
public” On 3/18/99, in an interoffice Memo, Plumb again denied the request:
“Regarding your request for elk classification data generated through Carrie
Schaefer’s ongoing research … we were remiss in presenting Ms. Schaefer’s
… data in the Yellowstone Wolf Project Annual Report.” And they were able
to hide this striking wolf predation in the annual reports because they
only gave averages for the entire northern herd – when the 0 calf ratios
in high wolf areas were averaged with the 46 calf ratios from elsewhere,
the average was still up near the 30 calf ratio needed to sustain herd
viability.
Of course, the Feds rationalized their suppression by saying that Schaefer’s
study was just raw data and still ongoing. Yet even after her report was
completed the Feds never publicized nor (to our knowledge) ever gave permission
to MT FWP to release the information. In fact, one MT FWP biologist who
is directly involved with decisions related to Yellowstone elk has stated
that the data was so well suppressed that he hasn’t even seen it. Rep.
Fuchs only got a copy of Schaefer’s study and the related inter-agency
letters after aggressively demanding copies of all documents related to
the incident.
Last winter when Fuchs, myself, and other officials did our own elk
calf survey we discovered the calf ratio had plummeted. The initial response
from amateur wolf advocates and some professional biologists was, “These
guys are hacks and don’t know how to count”. After the official elk census
came out and totally substantiated our claims, they changed their tune.
They said, “OK, they’re right about the drop, but we can’t prove it’s due
to wolves. It could be drought or hard winters, etc.”
Yet the Schaefer study strongly implicates wolves as the significant
factor in two different ways. First, geographically – during the course
of the same winter, she observed alarmingly low calf ratios in high wolf
areas even while calf ratios remained above average outside high wolf areas.
This mitigates against the notion that the low calf ratios are caused by
drought or hard winters.
Secondly, when coupled with current data for the entire Northern Yellowstone
elk herd; an alarming pattern is revealed. In 1997 and 98, the low calf
ratio was confined to areas of high wolf concentration – the Lamar Valley,
etc. In this last year or so, as dense wolf populations have reached critical
mass across the entire northern Yellowstone Range; we “surprisingly” see
the area of low calf ratio also expand to encompass the entire herd.
Let’s cut to the chase (pardon the pun). Our ancestors realized long
ago that the wolf is a unique critter – a killing machine and a breeding
machine all rolled into one. Alaskan studies reveal wolf population increases
of 34% annually, even while being aggressively hunted. Data from the first
few years of our Tri-state wolf experiment also verify this same 34% annual
increase. It doesn’t take a CPA (or a professional wildlife biologist)
to figure out that this rate results in a 1000% increase in population
size every 8 years!
If the Feds continue to break promises, suppress evidence, and drag
their feet for 3-5 more years; our wildlife and livestock may need to be
placed on the Endangered Species List by then (never mind our pet dogs,
llamas, and small children).
I repeat – we are not calling for eradication of wolves. We are simply
saying that NOW is the time for the Feds to move immediately to de-list
the wolf; so that MT, Wyoming, and Idaho state Fish & Game Departments
can manage wolves like any other species. It’s time for the Feds to make
up for past sins (of commission and omission) by turning over wolf decisions
to more trustworthy managers.
(Joe Balyeat is a member
of the Montana House of Representatives, representing HD 32 in the Gallatin
Valley. He is Chairman of the House Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Committee
and a member of the Legislative Audit Committee. He also serves as a Director
of the Montana Shooting Sports Association.) |