I
was born and raised in a Montana where a man’s word was his bond, his handshake
good as gold. Native Montanans are fighting mad on the wolf issue because
they believe the Feds have repeatedly broken their word, reneged on the
original deal; and that our traditional hunting way of life is paying the
price for this violated trust. As an avid bowhunter north of Yellowstone,
I’ve often videotaped wolftracks and witnessed marauding wolves in bighorn
country while simultaneously noting the dramatic decline in bighorn and
moose populations in the area.
Meanwhile, longtime local residents have cried in vain about wolf depredation
on more numerous species like elk. They argue the calf/cow ratio has been
devastated by wolves; that the Yellowstone herd is teetering on a population
cliff. Further, they argue this devastation is occurring despite assurances
in the original wolf introduction plan that such a decline wouldn’t occur.
The original 1990 introduction document was titled “Wolves for Yellowstone?
A Report to Congress and the Department of Interior”. It documented
the historical (20 year) calf/cow ratio at 33% average and (based on statistical
modeling) argued that wolf introduction wouldn’t significantly reduce this
ratio.
Their statistical model had one major flaw – it only estimated the
number of elk killed; without differentiating the type of elk – that wolves
tend to selectively prey upon calves – and could potentially decimate
a herd by wiping out its “replacement stock” long before the total herd
size declined enough to start limiting the number of wolves.
Is there evidence? Friends of the Northern Yellowstone Elk Herd
(FNYEH) has argued that their surveys reveal a calf ratio dropping below
10% -- far below the 30% needed to maintain stable herd populations.
Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) and Park Service surveys paint a different
picture -- a calf ratio of 28-29%; only slightly below the 30% target.
Yet these surveys are a year or more old, and debate intensifies regarding
the accuracy of all game surveys. The bipartisan Legislative Audit Committee
(on which I serve) has expressed deep concern, and recently had a near-unanimous
vote mandating a performance audit of FWP game census techniques.
I also serve as Vice-Chairman of the House FWP Committee. Because of
increasingly dire local reports, and the huge disparity in calf survey
numbers, I recently participated firsthand in a census of wintering Yellowstone
elk in Paradise Valley. I joined House FWP Committee Chairman Dan Fuchs
and FWP Commission Chairman Dan Walker, and we were accompanied by FNYEH
Chairman Bob Fanning and lifelong local resident Bill Hoppe. We surveyed
nearly 500 elk wintering near Dailey Lake. To ensure accuracy, we had multiple
individuals counting the same elk. Results: Our survey revealed a calf
ratio of just over 12% --- far below the original target of 30 to
maintain a stable herd! Shocking, indeed. While this sample is somewhat
smaller than Park Service samples, it is far closer than previous news
reports that the official survey was 10 or more times larger than our sample.
Last year’s official survey totaled 988 cows, our survey – 428 cows. Moreover,
calf/cow ratios should remain relatively consistent regardless of the number
surveyed.
I believe the Feds must remove the wolf from the Endangered Species
List without delay, so that Montana FWP can manage the rapidly exploding
wolf populations (now well over 500). The original plan called for de-listing
once 30 breeding pairs were established. Wolf Reintroduction chief Ed Bangs
admits there are now 46 breeding pairs! He and other wolf officials in
Montana agree that it’s time to de-list. But with 46 pairs already, and
wolf broods of six or seven pups each, if the Feds continue to stretch
out the de-listing process for another 3 years, the elk herds will be demolished.
Once the elk, bighorns, and moose are gone; the next items on the menu
are domestic sheep and cattle.
Because I’ve dared speak out, pro-wolf enviros will no doubt bombard
the papers with letters impugning my intelligence, while spouting reams
of data diminishing wolf impact. But I have very good eyesight and
I can certainly count… I know what I saw. And the wolf lobby’s data suffers
from a credibility gap --- they’ve violated their own original agreements
so many times, that native Montanans are no longer listening to them. They’ve
turned the “Boy Who Cried Wolf” upside down -- they’ve cried “No Wolf Problem”
so many times that we’ve tuned them out. Those of us who’ve spent our lives
in the mountains around Yellowstone see elk populations aging rapidly and
headed for a cliff. In our favorite hunting spots, we see limited bighorn
and moose populations already decimated.
Friends of the Northern Yellowstone Elk isn’t a radical “shoot,
shovel & shut up” anti-wolf group. They’ve never suggested we totally
eradicate wolves. They’ve simply argued that now is the time for the Feds
to live up to their original agreement; de-list the wolf from the Endangered
List so that Montana FWP can properly manage wolf populations relative
to ungulate populations. The original plan called for 78 Yellowstone wolves;
we now have at least 200 by some estimates. And the total tri-state wolf
population exceeds 700. It can’t wait 3 more years --- by then even the
vast elk herd may have followed the sheep and moose into disaster. Sometimes,
crying “Wolf!” is a good thing.
(Joe Balyeat is a member
of the Montana House of Representatives, representing HD 32 in the Gallatin
Valley. He is Chairman of the House Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Committee
and a member of the Legislative Audit Committee. He also serves as a Director
of the Montana Shooting Sports Association.) |