Bowhunting.net
Whitetail Deer Management; Part 1
By T.R. Michels
May 31, 2005, 16:45
More and more whitetail hunters
are interested in hunting for trophy animals. But, because game managers
are often interested in providing a large, healthy, balanced herd, and
not necessarily trophy animals, these hunters are taking it upon themselves
to try to increase their chances of seeing a trophy by improving the habitat
and practicing quality management, with the emphasis on growing trophies.
The hunter who is only interested in helping the animals grow bigger racks
by providing food plots, minerals and limiting his hunting to larger racked
animals often unwittingly improves the quality of the entire herd. Not
only will the bucks use the food and minerals, but so will the does and
fawns. If the hunter then passes up smaller animals he gives them a chance
to mature, develop fully and contribute to the gene pool.
Management Practices
There is no question that
deer herds must be managed. Increasing human populations, urban sprawl
and changing land practices have led to less available deer habitat while
deer herds have continued to increase, which has led to an overpopulation
of deer in many areas. This has compelled wildlife managers to issue abundant
doe permits each year in order to keep the deer herds within the carrying
capacity of the available habitat. The deer management practices of many
wildlife agencies revolve around the need to balance the deer herds in
relation to the habitat while still trying to keep deer populations high
enough for hunting, with hunting as the primary method of deer reduction.
The current practice of keeping deer populations high enough that they
can be hunted, and the past management practice of bucks only hunting,
combined with the belief by many hunters that they should only shoot bucks
if they want to keep deer numbers high, is precisely the reason why there
are too many deer, particularly does.
It is usually too many does,
not too many bucks in a deer herd, that prompts game managers to issue
numerous doe permits in the hopes that enough deer will be removed to keep
their numbers at acceptable levels. Eventually this becomes a vicious cycle
and both the deer and the habitat suffer. The effects of this cycle generally
result in low buck:doe ratios and fewer numbers of dominant breeding bucks,
which leads to breeding periods that are later, and longer, than they should
be, resulting in poor spring survival rates of fawns.
To add to the problem of
too many deer, but not enough bucks, the interest in trophy hunting for
white-tailed deer has skyrocketed in the past few years. This interest
in high scoring whitetail racks by numerous hunters puts added pressure
on the already depleted number of large antlered animals, and further reduces
the number of available older dominant breeding bucks. Fewer numbers of
bucks, particularly older dominants, result in fewer contacts between the
does and the priming pheromones deposited by bucks at rubs and scrapes.
These priming pheromones are thought to cause the does to come into estrus
and help synchronize the rut activity between the does and the bucks. When
these pheromones are absent the does may come into estrus from as early
as mid-October to as late as January.
In a deer management study
by Larry Marchinton between 1981 and 1986, an increase in the buck
to doe ratio from 25:100 in 1981-82, to 54:100 in 1983-84 resulted in the
average breeding date changing from November 11 in 1981 to October 15 in
1982, almost a month earlier than normal, and the length of the breeding
period was shortened from 96 to 43 days. In another study using quality
management techniques, the average breeding date occurred almost two months
earlier.
As a result of these studies
it is now believed that the peak of the rut, or peak breeding period, of
white-tailed deer could normally occur during mid-October in some southern
areas.
During Marchinton's quality
management study the average number of fetuses per does over the age of
2 1/2 years increased from 1.6 in 1985 to 1.9 in 1986, and pregnancy in
doe fawns was detected in 1985. Fetal male:female sex ratios shifted from
64:36 during 1981-83, to a more balanced 47:53 during 1984-86. The average
weights of yearling bucks increased from 90 pounds in 1982 to 110.5 pounds
during the 1983-86 portion of the study. There was a significant weight
increase in the 3.5 year and older bucks in a similar study by McKelvy.
The positive results of these studies were credited to the increased age
structure of the bucks.
An increase in the number
of older dominant bucks also has a direct suppressing effect on the testosterone
levels of younger bucks, which reduces their aggressiveness and competition
for breeding privileges. Since a low position in the breeding hierarchy
results in less reproductive behavior and lower weight loss, those young
bucks that do not breed grow to greater body size before they become dominant.
This results in an overall increase in the number of older dominant bucks
which leads to earlier fawning dates and heavier body sizes of yearling
bucks, and this leads to higher survival rates and eventually to increased
buck numbers.
If both game managers and
hunters can agree to reduce the number of does and let the younger bucks
grow, while still keeping the herds balanced and within the carrying capacity
of the habitat, there will be an increase in the number of older bucks.
There is also a good probability that the younger non-breeding bucks, because
they are not stressed by breeding activity, will produce larger racks.
The increased number of older bucks may also shorten the length of the
rut and make it occur earlier. This could mean that hunters who prefer
to hunt during the rut might be forced to hunt a month earlier, and they
might be forced to take up archery hunting, or game managers might be forced
to change the timing of some hunts. But, the end result of an increased
number of older bucks will create a healthier more balanced deer herd,
and increase the odds of hunters seeing more, and bigger, bucks.
Responsible Deer Management
Any type of deer management
should take into account many factors; herd size, buck to doe ratio, age
structure of the herd, fawning rates, type of habitat, available food sources,
seasonal use of the habitat, and hunting success by age, and sex. One of
the first steps in deer management should be to determine the size and
makeup of the herd. A fairly accurate count of all the animals should be
taken to determine buck:doe:fawn ratio and fawning rates; to determine
if the herd is in balance with the available habitat, so that overuse of
the habitat by the deer does not occur; which could resulting in habitat
destruction, poor nutrition, starvation, disease, stress, and poor reproduction
and growth of the deer herd.
Responsible Deer Management
is designed to produce a socially balanced deer herd by keeping the herd
at or below the carrying capacity of the habitat; by balancing the buck
to doe ratio of the herd; by ensuring that there are adequate numbers of
both sexes and all ages classes of deer in the herd, so that maximum breeding
occurs at the appropriate time of the year.
In order for Responsible
Deer Management to work hunters and game managers must realize that:
-
The habitat can carry only so
many deer, it makes no difference whether they are bucks or does. Once
the number of deer exceeds the carrying capacity of the habitat there will
eventually be habitat destruction, which can lead to disease, stress, and
starvation of the deer. Or the deer, particularly younger bucks, will leave
to find more suitable habitat making them susceptible to injury and death
by natural causes, hunting, or vehicle collisions.
-
Once the carrying capacity of
the habitat has been determined, the total number of deer should be kept
below that capacity, so that there is adequate nutrition in winter, and
in case of forage and habitat loss due to natural causes.
-
Because the habitat can carry
only so many deer, and one of the goals of Responsible Deer Management
is to ensure that there are appropriate numbers of both sexes, and all
age classes of deer, one of the first objectives should be to balance the
buck to doe ratio of the herd. The best way to increase the buck:doe ratio
is to remove some of the does. In order to keep the buck:doe ratio stabilized
an appropriate number of both bucks and does should be removed every year.
-
To increase the average rack
size of the herd younger bucks must be allowed to reach four to five years
of age, which is when they begin to develop larger racks. It may be four
to five years before there are significant numbers of larger racked bucks
available.
-
The oldest and youngest deer,
and bucks that are exhausted from the rut, are usually the weakest and
the first to die. In order to keep weaker deer alive when they are under
stress their health needs must be provided for.
-
Increased deer attraction to
a particular property, improved survival and fawning rates, and increased
body and antler size can be achieved by providing adequate cover and water,
planting deer forage and browse, and providing year round minerals. Supplemental
feed should be supplied in the winter and early spring when deer are stressed.
Social Structure
In ideal conditions the
buck to doe ratio should be one buck to one doe (1:1), in areas where quality
management has not been practiced it may be as low as one buck to three
does (1:3). Keeping the buck to doe ratio in balance helps increase the
number of available trophies. It can also improve the social ranking, health
and reproductive rate of the herd. A herd of 100 deer with a makeup of
50 percent bucks and 50 percent does will not increase by 100 percent per
year, because some of the does will be too young to breed and some too
old to conceive. Even if each doe produces twins the natural mortality
rate generally keeps the yearly increase below 100 animals per year. If
you are trying to increase the number of trophies in the area you must
remember that the habitat can only carry so many deer, it makes no difference
if they are bucks or does. In order to keep both the habitat and the animals
healthy the herd must also be kept in balance with the carrying capacity
of the habitat.
Carrying Capacity
Let's assume that there
are 100 animals with a 50:50 male to female ratio and the property has
a carrying capacity of 150 animals. If every female produces twins and
3/4 of the young survive the herd is now above carrying capacity of the
land with 175 animals. Up to 25 animals should be removed through natural
mortality, predation or hunting to prevent habitat destruction and starvation.
If half the young are male and half female, and no natural mortality or
predation occurs the male to female ratio must be kept in balance by removing
12 males and 12 females the next year. This will keep the herd at carrying
capacity. But, the herd should be kept below carrying capacity. By keeping
the herd below capacity you insure that if a severe winter, drought or
habitat destruction occurs the animals may still survive.
In many cases hunters only
remove the males from the herd, which can be disastrous. If 25 males are
removed from the herd there will be 37 males and 62 females, leaving 99
animals. Some of the males shot will be 1 1/2 to 3 1/2 years old and will
never have a chance to become trophies. But, the real problem is that there
are now 62 females that can conceivably produce 124 young with a 75 percent
survival rate, increasing the herd by 93 the next year for a total of 192,
with 83 males and 109 females. Because the herd is above carrying capacity
habitat destruction is likely to occur. If the hunters again remove only
males, taking 42, there are still 109 females instead of the original 50.
If the practice of taking only males continues there will not be enough
mature males left to ensure that all the females will be bred during the
peak of the rut; some late born fawns will starve or die of exposure, and
the population may crash. Even if the population doesn't suffer the number
of trophy males will decline.
In order to produce trophy
males some of the females must be taken each year. If the habitat is at
carrying capacity and the herd balanced (as many hunters wish), as many
females as males must be taken in order to keep the herd in balance with
the habitat. If the herd is kept below carrying capacity there may be enough
forage even if the harvest quotas are not met; production is higher than
normal; or forage production is reduced by unforeseen circumstances. The
best strategy is to keep the herd below carrying capacity, and the male
to female ratio as balanced as possible, to produce the highest number
of trophy class animals.
Ground Cover Foods
To improve the forage quality
in your open areas you can plant perennial ground covers of forbes. Most
deer books tell you that deer eat forbes. But what are forbes? They're
wildflowers. Good perennial forbes for deer include Birdsfoot Trefoil,
Cicer milkvetch, Crownvetch, Lancer Perennial Pea, Lathco Flat Pea, Lespedeza
(Bi-color, Kobe, Korean, Serecia) and Sainfoin. If you want to have more
people interested in CRP and habitat restoration, plant annual wild flowers
in your CRP fields; landowners, farmers, nature lovers and non-hunters
will love it.
Food Plots
Once spring arrives the
animals seek out new green growth which you can supply through a food plot..
The traditional food plantings for deer are alfalfa, corn, fescue, soybeans,
rye grass, oats, and clover (Alsike, Arrowleaf, Crimson, Huia New Zealand
White, Ladino [Regal, California]). You can also plant Dwarf Essex Rape,
Kale and Small Burnett. Many of the available wildlife food mixtures contain
three or more plant types that mature at different times of the year to
provide nutrition from spring to winter. Choose a brand that is designed
for your area. Even if there is already adequate forage in the area the
deer soon discover food plots and begin using them in the spring and continue
using them through the hunting season. This makes it much easier to pattern
the deer in the fall.
Specialty Foods
I am a firm believer in
planting pumpkins and squash to attract deer. Deer love these large, carbohydrate
rich vegetables so much they will dig down through frozen soil and snow
to get to them. During the growing season you will have to enclose the
area with a fence high enough that deer can't jump, or use an electric
fence to keep them out. Once the vegetables are ripe and deer season opens,
take down the fence or turn off the electricity and watch the deer flock
in. Every deer within two miles used my 2 acre pumpkin patch well into
January.
If you want to purchase any
of the above mentioned plant species contact your local seed dealer, or
Kester's Wild Game Food Nurseries, Incorporated: PO Box 516, Omro WI 54963,
FAX 1-920-685-6727. For browse and mast trees contact your local nursery,
or Musser Forests, Inc. PO Box 340, Indiana, PA, 1-412-465-5685
Soil Preparation
Before you plant you need
to test the soil to see if you have to improve it, and then prepare the
soil, which you can do in a number of different ways; burning, plowing
or discing, spraying, mowing. Consult with your conservation agent about
testing and improving the soil , and the best way to prepare the soil within
your budget. Burning is usually the least expensive way to prepare soil
for planting, but it can be dangerous. Fire can be used to set back succession
on a variety of plants and habitats for better habitat. Most prairies and
meadows can benefit by controlled burns, which often cause long dormant
natural annual seeds to germinate. Be sure you find out the local regulations
before you burn.
If you want to break up stands
of sod forming grasses that are choking other forms of vegetation you can
plow or disc the soil. Then you can let the area grow back naturally, or
you can plant more desirable vegetation or food plots. If you want to completely
start over with a new CRP plot or food planting, you will probably have
to kill the existing vegetation with Roundup or Plateau. Small to medium
stands of grasses and forbes make great deer habitat. You can improve a
stand of grass by mowing it in strips to manipulate the existing vegetation,
to provide easier movement for the wildlife, to increase habitat diversity,
and to enhance the food and cover value of the habitat.
Water
There is one factor that
contributes greatly to the growth of big racks that you can't control,
water. Available ground water, whether through rain, snow pack or irrigation
is required for plant growth and the assimilation of vital nutrients for
the plants. Too little rain means poor forage conditions for the animals,
and poor growth conditions for racks. There isn't much you can do about
inadequate moisture in your area. You can provide more watering sources
on your property by damning creeks and gullies to collect runoff water,
and by digging wildlife ponds and wells. Make sure that existing or new
water sources have sufficient and easy access for the game. Clean them
out regularly to provide good water.
Improving the existing habitat
and providing food plots, supplemental feed, minerals and water will not
only increase the health of the animals, it will attract more animals to
the area. Once you have a population that is at or below carrying capacity,
you can begin to selectively hunt to balance the male to female ratio,
and take only the trophy class animals and a few does a year. When you
begin to see lots of small racked animals "Let 'em go and let 'em grow."
Then begin harvesting the bigger, older bucks.
This article is an excerpt
from the Deer Manager's Manual ($9.95+ $5.00 s&h), by T.R. Michels.
T.R. Michels is a nationally
recognized game animal behaviorist and researcher, outdoor writer/speaker
and author. His books include The Complete Whitetail Addict's Manual, Turkey
Addicts Manual, Duck & Goose Addict's Manual, and Elk Addict's Manual.
For more information contact T.R. Michels, Trinity Mountain Outdoors, 612-310-5585,
TRMichels@yahoo.com or
www.TRMichels.com.
© Copyright 2005 by
Bowhunting.net